By CPA Boaz Kinara
Most business establishments that command the commercial space today wouldn’t have occupied that coveted position without agile and transformative leaders at the helm. Since their infancy, successful business empires are usually guided by the need to tap seasoned talent and tact from the job market to navigate the turbulent business environment. To that end, it goes without saying that such entities are usually keen to incorporate the core values and principles of corporate governance alongside having skilled personnel in the driving seat.
It is noteworthy that since the advent of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries, the ground has shifted significantly, with even more interest and scrutiny of those charged with governance. To lend credence to this assertion, a brief look back at what transpired on the leadership stage during the industrial revolution, vis-à-vis what is demanded of a corporate leader in today’s fast-paced business environment, would suffice.
The industrial revolution is often divided into two: the First Industrial Revolution lasted from the mid-18th century to about 1830 and was centred in Britain. The second Industrial Revolution lasted from the mid-19th century until the early 20th century, spreading to continental Europe, North America, and Japan. The third and fourth industrial revolutions feature a unique spectrum of technological advancements that will be discussed later on. As earlier stated, it’s notable that most multinational corporations that control global markets in various sectors today mushroomed from the muddy waters of limited technology and skilled labour that bogged down most start-ups during the Great Industrial Revolution.
Therefore, to draw concrete conclusions, it’s imperative to retrospectively examine the historical dynamics of corporate leadership, which have, over time, shaped the concept of effective leadership that most firms seek in today’s economy. This begs the following questions, which this article seeks to address: How was leadership then? How has it evolved? What opportunities does it present in today’s business environment? What needs to be done as we head into the future, which abounds with endless risks and uncertainties?
The First Industrial Revolution was decisive in transitioning from traditional manual production to a machine- and mechanised-labour system. An essential feature of the first Industrial Revolution was the mechanisation of industries and the introduction of steam power to replace manual labour (Broadberry et al., 2011; Clark, 2010). The factory system replaced artisanal production and shaped mass production and standardisation. This replacement led to the development of transportation infrastructure, including railroads and steamships, thus facilitating trade and transportation.
The period of the First Industrial Revolution was defined by centralised management and autocracy, where strategic decision-making was simplified and concentrated in the hands of rulers. The main emphasis in management under an autocratic leadership style was the organisation of the workforce, the mechanisation of production, and the management of large factories. Leaders, often owners, had absolute power over decision-making. The task was to ensure the effective functioning of mass production. In this context, the autocratic management style proved effective and appropriate to the era’s requirements. Leadership focused on ensuring standardisation, efficient resource use, and increased productivity through top-down control.
The Second Industrial Revolution was marked by the widespread adoption of electrification and new energy sources, such as oil and gas, which revolutionised manufacturing processes and methods. In this period, new forms of transportation emerged, including automobiles and aeroplanes, which expanded the scope of trade. Around the world, industries became more mechanised and automated, and mass production became even more critical. This period was also characterised by the emergence of large monopolies and conglomerates, leading to the need to regulate markets and corporate activities.
Organisational leadership in this period needed effective management of large corporations that emerged, which led to the development of transactional leadership and strategic management. The primary focus of business leaders was on transactional relations between managers and subordinates, mainly to control the production process, standardise, and optimise activities.
The Third Industrial Revolution defined the second half of the 20th century. The main characteristics of this period were automation and the use of electronics, which led to increased automation of production and the development of new technologies such as computers and information systems. In this period, transformational leadership stimulated employees’ creativity and personal development. Transformational leaders in this period began to emphasise the personal development of subordinates and the stimulation of staff creativity. Instead of focusing on control and standardisation, transformational leaders prioritised developing their teams’ potential, promoting personal growth, and creating conditions for the expression of creative initiative.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution represents the current period of technological and production innovation. The main features of this stage are high-tech automation and increased interaction among digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and actual production. Currently, we have the Internet of Things (IoT), real-time data processing, sophisticated software and applications for running business operations, large-scale analytics, and enhanced interaction between humans and machines.
In these modern times, we also have a young and aggressive generation christened as Gen-Z, a demographic cohort born roughly between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, succeeding the Millennials. Their approach to thorny issues is often defined by their signature fiery character. They will, at the slightest provocation and without hesitation, speak truth to power with little or no regard to the brutal response that’s often meted out to politically dissenting voices in many countries around the world.
A case in point is the recent youth-led uprising that toppled the government in Nepal. They are always ready to ruffle the feathers of the political elite whenever they feel their country lacks political will to fix thorny issues like runaway corruption and bad leadership – even if it means putting their lives on the line. But one thing that sets them apart is their tech-savvy nature. They are recognised as “digital natives” who grew up with the internet, smartphones, and social media. Nevertheless, this generation is known for being pragmatic about work, valuing diversity and inclusion, and having a strong focus on mental health and well-being – a trait that today’s leaders can harness to boost productivity.
From the foregoing analysis of leadership evolution, corporate leaders are presented with a wide array of opportunities from good corporate governance, which include: enhanced access to capital and investor confidence, improved risk mitigation and operational efficiency, strengthened reputation and stakeholder trust, better decision-making, increased staff retention, and alignment with regulatory compliance and sustainability goals. These benefits foster innovation, productivity, and long-term growth, contributing to broader economic dynamism.
In summary, the evolution of the concept of leadership culminates in the following principles of corporate governance that entities can implement in their systems:
• Accountability: The board and management are accountable to shareholders and other stakeholders for their actions and decisions, ensuring they serve everyone’s best interests.
• Transparency: Information about the company’s operations, finances, and decision-making processes should be clear, open, and disclosed in a timely manner.
• Fairness: All stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the community, should be treated equally and equitably, with their interests balanced.
• Responsibility: The board and management have a duty to act ethically and in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders, and to adhere to legal and ethical standards.
• Independence: Board members should be able to make objective and impartial decisions without being unduly influenced by personal interests or external pressures.
• Risk Management: A crucial element is the effective monitoring and management of risks, ensuring potential challenges are identified and mitigated.
• Shareholder Rights: Effective governance protects shareholders’ rights and promotes equitable treatment.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Encouraging and considering the interests of all stakeholders, not just shareholders, is vital for long-term success and sustainability
The upshot is that, in today’s environment, the importance of empathy and the ability to understand staff’s needs and expectations comes to the fore. In contrast to the First Industrial Revolution, where subordinate staff played second fiddle, transformative leaders in the current industrial revolution understand that human capital is a significant asset, and the ability to empathise plays a critical role in interacting with a team.
Empathetic leaders actively listen to their employees, consider their needs, and take into account the personal and professional aspects of their lives. They strive to create working conditions that promote self-expression and creativity, essential elements of any successful business in today’s competitive commercial landscape!
Boaz Kinara is an Internal Auditor at Kencream Sacco, bringing over ten years of experience in audit, accounting, and finance to the role. He has worked with various organisations across the sector since earning his Bachelor of Commerce (Finance) degree and CPA (K) certification from KCA University. Beyond his core responsibilities, Boaz actively contributes to corporate affairs through experience sharing and knowledge transfer.
Email: [email protected]
